Analisis Faktor-faktor Penyebab Migrasi Penduduk Jawa Akibat Pertumbuhan Penduduk Yang Tinggi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dinamika kependudukan menjadi salah satu aspek yang harus diperhatikandalam perencanaan wilayah. Kependudukan penting untuk diperhatikan dan menjadi bahan pertimbangan dikarenakan penduduk merupakan subjek sekaligus objek pembangunan guna mencapai kesejahteraan. Migrasi merupakan salah satu dari tiga faktor dasar yang mempengaruhi pertumbuhan penduduk, selain kelahiran (fertilitas) dan kematian (mortalitas).Migrasi dapat meningkatkan jumlah penduduk apabila jumlah penduduk yang masuk ke suatu wilayah lebih banyak daripada jumlah penduduk yang meninggalkan wilayah tersebut. Penelitian ini mengkaji lebih dalam dinamika migrasi penduduk yang terjadi di pulau Jawa. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif dengan penelitian mengguanakan Studi Literatur. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui faktor penyebab terjadinya migrasi penduduk jawa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".