MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205574506 · doi:10.32920/16820890.v1

Investigation Of The Impacts Of Local Microclimate On PV Energy Efficiency And Outdoor Thermal Comfort

2021· preprint· en· W4205574506 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jonathan Graham

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Heat Island Mitigation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersMitacs
KeywordsMicroclimateEnvironmental scienceUrban heat islandThermal comfortPhotovoltaic systemPhotovoltaicsGreenhouse gasMeteorologyEfficient energy useArchitectural engineeringAtmospheric sciencesGeographyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cities are increasingly incentivizing rooftop photovoltaics (PV) for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions together with more urban forestry and high albedo surfaces for the mitigation the of urban heat island (UHI) effects. Previous interventions are proven to be effective in isolation, but their combined performance is seldom considered. Through microclimate simulations of a neighbourhood in Brampton, Ontario, this study investigates the trade-offs between large-scale deployments of rooftop PV, street trees and cool roofs. The performance of each intervention is compared in terms of PV efficiency and the Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI) values. The study shows that street trees can reduce the energy output of rooftop PV significantly depending on their height and location, and such, there is need for solar access laws in Ontario. Further, adopting rooftop PV instead of cool roofs can result in a pedestrian environment up to 0.5 °C higher UTCI during a heat wave.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUrban Heat Island MitigationFrench-language works237,207