MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205600418 · doi:10.18280/ts.380619

Early-Stage Brown Spot Disease Recognition in Paddy Using Image Processing and Deep Learning Techniques

2021· article· en· W4205600418 on OpenAlex
Santosh Kumar Upadhyay, Avadhesh Kumar

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSmart Agriculture and AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThresholdingArtificial intelligenceSegmentationPixelStage (stratigraphy)Brown riceImage segmentationLeaf spotPattern recognition (psychology)Paddy fieldComputer scienceBiologyImage (mathematics)Agronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

India is an agricultural country. Paddy is the main crop here on which the livelihood of millions of people depends. Brown spot disease caused by fungus is the most predominant infection that appears as oval and round lesions on the paddy leaves. If not addressed on time, it might result in serious crop loss. Pesticide use for plant disease treatment should be limited because it raises costs and pollutes the environment. Usage of pesticide and crop loss both can be minimized if we recognize the disease in a timely manner. Our aim is to develop a simple, fast, and effective deep learning structure for early-stage brown spot disease detection by utilizing infection severity estimation using image processing techniques. The suggested approach consists of two phases. In the first phase, the brown spot infected leaf image dataset is partitioned into two sets named as early-stage brown spot and developed stage brown spot. This partition is done on the basis of calculated infection severity. Infection severity is computed as a ratio of infected pixel count to total leaf pixel count. Total leaf pixel counts are determined by segmenting the leaf region from the background image using Otsu's thresholding technique. Infected pixel counts are determined by segmenting infected regions from leaf regions using Triangle thresholding segmentation. In the second phase, a fully connected CNN architecture is built for automatic feature extraction and classification. The CNN-based classification model is trained and validated using early-stage brown spot, developed stage brown spot, and healthy leaves images of rice plants. Early-stage brown spot and developed stage brown spot images used in training and validation are the same images that are obtained in phase 1. The experimental analysis shows that the proposed fully connected CNN-based early-stage brown spot disease recognition model is an effective approach. The classification accuracy of the suggested model is found to be 99.20%. The result of the suggested method is compared with those existing CNN-based disease recognition and classification methods that have used leaf images to recognize the diseases. It is observed that the performance of our method is significantly better than compared methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.544

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it