Early-Stage Brown Spot Disease Recognition in Paddy Using Image Processing and Deep Learning Techniques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
India is an agricultural country. Paddy is the main crop here on which the livelihood of millions of people depends. Brown spot disease caused by fungus is the most predominant infection that appears as oval and round lesions on the paddy leaves. If not addressed on time, it might result in serious crop loss. Pesticide use for plant disease treatment should be limited because it raises costs and pollutes the environment. Usage of pesticide and crop loss both can be minimized if we recognize the disease in a timely manner. Our aim is to develop a simple, fast, and effective deep learning structure for early-stage brown spot disease detection by utilizing infection severity estimation using image processing techniques. The suggested approach consists of two phases. In the first phase, the brown spot infected leaf image dataset is partitioned into two sets named as early-stage brown spot and developed stage brown spot. This partition is done on the basis of calculated infection severity. Infection severity is computed as a ratio of infected pixel count to total leaf pixel count. Total leaf pixel counts are determined by segmenting the leaf region from the background image using Otsu's thresholding technique. Infected pixel counts are determined by segmenting infected regions from leaf regions using Triangle thresholding segmentation. In the second phase, a fully connected CNN architecture is built for automatic feature extraction and classification. The CNN-based classification model is trained and validated using early-stage brown spot, developed stage brown spot, and healthy leaves images of rice plants. Early-stage brown spot and developed stage brown spot images used in training and validation are the same images that are obtained in phase 1. The experimental analysis shows that the proposed fully connected CNN-based early-stage brown spot disease recognition model is an effective approach. The classification accuracy of the suggested model is found to be 99.20%. The result of the suggested method is compared with those existing CNN-based disease recognition and classification methods that have used leaf images to recognize the diseases. It is observed that the performance of our method is significantly better than compared methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".