MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205616685 · doi:10.7202/1081641ar

L’étude des langues métisses et les programmes de revitalisation du mitchif

2007· article· fr· W4205616685 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Denis Gagnon, Suzanne Gagné

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches amérindiennes au Québec · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic and Sociocultural Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Saint-Boniface
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En juin 1998, le ministère du Patrimoine canadien a mis sur pied l’Initiative des langues autochtones avec un financement de 20 millions de dollars versé sur une période de quatre ans. En 2002, ce projet a été reconduit sous la direction du Groupe de travail sur les langues et les cultures autochtones avec un financement de 160 millions de dollars versé sur cinq ans. Les organisations autochtones ont accepté d’accorder 10 % de ces deux fonds pour la revitalisation de la langue mitchif. Comme la langue joue un rôle très important dans l’identité métisse, cet article fait le point sur l’étude des langues métisses et présente les résultats des programmes de revitalisation linguistique du mitchif mis en place par le gouvernement fédéral et les organisations métisses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches amérindiennes au QuébecSame topicLinguistic and Sociocultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207