MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205623556 · doi:10.1109/mspec.2022.9676181

Contributors

2022· article· en· W4205623556 on OpenAlex
Susan Hassler, Harry Goldstein, Jean Kumagai, Elizabeth Bretz, Mark Montgomery, Evan Ackerman, Samuel Moore, Philip Ross, David Schneider, Eliza Strickland, Willie Jones, Michael Koziol, Kathy Pretz, Joanna Goodrich, Joseph Levine, Alan Gardner, Robert Charette, Steven Cherry, Charles Q. Choi, Peter Fairley, Maria Gallucci, W Gibbs, Mark Harris, Jeremy Hsu, Allison Marsh, Prachi Patel, Megan Scudellari, Lawrence Ulrich, Emily Waltz, Administrative Assistant, Ramona Foster, Brandon Palacio, Randi Klett, Erik Vrielink, Peter Tuohy, Multimedia Production Specialist, Michael Spector, Gail Schnitzer, Felicia Spagnoli, Nicole Evans Gyimah, David G. Brock, Ronald F. DeMara, Shahin Farshchi, Lawrence Hall, Jason Hui, Leah H. Jamieson, Mary Jepsen, Deepa Kundur, Peter B. Luh, Michel M. Maharbiz, Somdeb Majumdar, Carmen S. Menoni, Sofia Olhede, Wen Tong, Qusi Alqarqaz, Stamatis Dragoumanos, Madeleine Glick, Francesca Iacopi, Cecilia Metra, Mirela Sechi, Annoni Notare, Shashi Pandey, John Purvis, Steven Heffner, Mark David, Erik Albin, Kaihua Liu, Mary Ellen, Randall Secretary, John Walz, Susan Kathy, Stephen Phillips, Maike Luiken, Roger Fujii, James Matthews, Katherine Duncan, J. Schindler, Thomas M. Conte, Paul Cunningham, Miriam Sanders, Christina Schober, Kreidieh Rabab, Dalma Ward, Eduardo Novak, Barry Tilton, Jill Gostin, Johnson Asumado, James Look, Timothy Lee, Jianjun Jason, A. Ĺuque, Alberto Cabañero-Sánchez, Theodore Hissey

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Spectrum · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCanadian Standards Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueIEEE SpectrumFrench-language works237,207