Bibliographic record
Abstract
All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: The submission process had no a software system. Call-for-paper was placed on the Conference web page (https://pasd-conf.ru/), the papers were submitted via e-mail. The reviews were asked and received via e-mails of Editors. • Number of submissions received: 68 • Number of submissions sent for review: 61 • Number of submissions accepted: 48 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 71% • Average number of reviews per paper: 1.6 • Total number of reviewers involved: 866 • Any additional info on review process: The consideration of the submitted manuscript included independent peer review process. We invited the reviewers from Russia, France, China, Turkestan, Iran, India, Ukraine, Georgia, Denmark, Slovak Republic, Germany, Sudan, Australia, Italy, Switzerland, USA, Kenya, Thailand, Poland, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, Indonesia, Singapore, Japan, Mexico, Malaysia, Sweden, Canada, Turkey, and Ghana. Reviewers gave their view and remarks for each paper. All reviewers were asked to provide within three weeks a detailed review with comments for authors and editors and evaluate paper taking into account Quality Criteria (originality motivation, repetition, and length of the paper), Presentation Criteria (title, abstract, methods, diagrams, figures, tables, and conclusion), and Technical Criteria (scientific merit, clarity of expression, communication of ideas, readability and discussion of concepts, and English). • Contact person for queries: Dr. Anna Godymchuk, Tobolsk Complex Scientific Station, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Science, Tobolsk, Russian Federation, godymchuk@tpu.ru Dr. Anton Stepanov, Chuvash State Agricultural Academy, Cheboksary, Russian Federation For.Anton_step@edu.academy21.ru
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.100 | 0.448 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.029 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.012 | 0.017 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.150 | 0.146 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".