MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205639558 · doi:10.1353/phx.2017.0028

The Final Pagan Generation by Edward J. Watts

2017· article· en· W4205639558 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
John Weisweiler

Bibliographic record

VenuePhoenix · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEliteHonourPower (physics)SociologyPeriod (music)DomesticationSocial statusGender studiesClothingPhoenixRepresentation (politics)EndogamyHistoryLawPolitical scienceSocial scienceDemographyAestheticsPopulationMetropolitan areaArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

198 PHOENIX collegia in this period. Coming primarily from high-ranking senatorial families, these civic patronesses were likely expected to use their informal power to help their client communities. Due to the gaps in social status and geographical distribution between patronae and matres, Hemelrijk argues that the two titles were not synonymous, suggesting instead that the emergence of matres points to the increasing domestication of public life in this period when financial pressures on local elites were increasing. This idea of the domestication of public life appears again in Chapter Six, “Female Presence: Public Honour and Representation,” where Hemelrijk demonstrates that elite women were honored with public statues most often as part of a family statuary group, and that women were fully involved in setting up and paying for statues for family members, including themselves. The timeless style of clothing and dignified poses of the statues, together with the inscriptions on the statue bases, further conveyed the woman’s exemplary status and thus justified the privileges of her elite social class. In this regard, women’s public statues served much the same purpose as those of their male relatives and thus serve to underscore the integration of elite women into civic life in the Roman West. Among several important observations in the concluding chapter, Hemelrijk corrects the notion that prominent women in their local communities were taking their cue from the women of the imperial family, arguing instead that a system of mutual influence between empresses and elite women of the Roman West is more plausible. In sum, Hemelrijk’s study helps to redefine both our notions of the roles of Roman women in their local communities and our perceptions of gender at work in the economic and political environments of Roman cities. This is a must read for classicists working on gender in the Roman empire, and especially for teachers of courses on women and gender in the Roman world. University of Notre Dame Elizabeth F. Mazurek The Final Pagan Generation. By Edward J. Watts. Oakland, CA: University of California Press (Transformation of the Classical Heritage 53). 2015. Pp. xvi, 327. This excellent book traces how the generation of Romans born in the 310s, an age cohort Watts dubs The Final Pagan Generation, experienced the history of the fourth century. These men and women spent their childhood in cities dominated by the smell of sacrificial meat, the noise of pagan festivals, and the sight of imposing neighbourhood shrines. The longest-lived among them died in a world in which animal sacrifice had been outlawed, bishops had become powerful civic leaders, and Christian activists had begun to demolish some of the empire’s most famous temples. By looking at the history of the fourth century through the eyes of one generation, Watts exploits the key insight of modern generational histories. The timing of social change is not merely the product of impersonal economic and social forces, but is influenced by the shared ways in which individuals of distinct age cohorts experience key events in their lives. Modern historians and sociologists map the social structure and self-understanding of generational groups through standardized questionnaires and detailed demographic analyses. Watts has no access to such data. Of necessity, his method is not quantitative, but qualitative. The book is structured around the lives of four exceptionally welldocumented (and long-lived) élite males: Libanius, a teacher of rhetoric from the ancient BOOK REVIEWS/COMPTES RENDUS 199 metropolis of Antioch in Syria; Themistius, a suave philosopher and orator who became the chief propagandist of several fourth-century emperors; Ausonius (the only Christian in the group), a professor from Bordeaux, who for some years was the éminence grise at the imperial court in Trier; and finally, Vettius Agorius Praetextatus, a prominent member of the Roman nobilitas who was promoted by Valentinian and his son to the highest administrative posts in the western half of the Roman empire. The book is divided into ten chronologically arranged chapters, which retell the history of the fourth century through the eyes of these four individuals. It might be contested that, by focusing on this limited group of extremely successful male politicians and male intellectuals, the book precludes an...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhoenixSame topicClassical Antiquity StudiesFrench-language works237,207