MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Survival outcomes associated with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in the adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer with FOLFOX.

2022· article· en· W4205645249 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sara Trincao-Batra, Rachel Goodwin, Horia Marginean, Jean A. Maroun, Michael M. Vickers, Timothy R. Asmis, Joanna Gotfrit

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeutropenia and Cancer Infections
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFOLFOXInternal medicineNeutropeniaOxaliplatinCohortColorectal cancerCancerProportional hazards modelSurgeryChemotherapyRetrospective cohort studyOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

81 Background: Patients undergoing adjuvant treatment with FOLFOX for colorectal cancer (CRC) are at risk of developing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN). We assessed survival outcomes in patients who develop CIN in this setting. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with CRC treated with FOLFOX at our institution in Canada from 2013 to 2015. The survival follow-up cut-off date was August 2021. Demographic, treatment, and outcome data were collected. CIN was defined as ANC <1.5, and all episodes of neutropenia were assumed to be the result of chemotherapy. Median OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier product limit estimates. Results: A total of 302 patients were included (baseline demographics in the table). Median follow-up was 110 months. In the overall cohort, 174 patients (58%) had at least one episode of CIN. CIN occurred in 56% of those with stage II cancer, 43% of those with low risk stage III cancer (T1-3 and N1), and 45% of those with high risk stage III cancer (T4 or N2). Median time to first CIN event was 4.3 months. Among patients with at least one episode of CIN, the first CIN event occurred during the first 3 months of treatment in 110 (63%). Among patients with at least one episode of CIN, 79 (45%) received subsequent granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF). The median OS in the overall cohort was 171 months. For patients with and without CIN the median OS had not been reached, HR 0.84 (95% CI 0.55-1.29, p=0.43). The median OS for patients with CIN treated with and without GCSF had not been reached, HR 1.02 (95% CI 0.57-1.82, p=0.94). The 5-year survival rate for patients with and without CIN was 87% vs 77%. The 10-year survival rate for patients with and without CIN was 70% vs 64%. A trend toward improved survival in those with CIN remained when results were analyzed by cancer stage. Conclusions: Patients with CIN had a trend toward improved survival compared to those who did not have CIN. There was no indication that GCSF in the setting of CIN impacted survival. The causes for the potentially protective effect of CIN in the setting of adjuvant CRC treatment require further elucidation.[Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.459
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicNeutropenia and Cancer InfectionsFrench-language works237,207