Resource Allocation for URLLC-Oriented Two-Way UAV Relaying
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to the high altitude and deployment flexibility, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) can be used as relays to avoid obstacles and extend the coverage of wireless networks. On the other hand, ultra-reliable and low-latency communication (URLLC) is often required to deliver the information reliably and timely for many emerging applications. In this correspondence, we combine the advantages of both UAV and URLLC to investigate the resource allocation for a URLLC-enabled two-way UAV relaying system. Our goal is to maximize the transmission rate of the backward link with the constraint of URLLC requirement for the forward link. The optimization is non-convex and difficult to solve. Therefore, the optimization variables are divided to several blocks, and three sub-problems are formulated and solved. Finally, an iterative algorithm is proposed to solve these sub-problems alternately. Simulation results show that the proposed joint optimization scheme can achieve excellent performance for the URLLC-enabled two-way UAV relaying system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it