MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205690649 · doi:10.26443/rcfr.v1i1.292

L’écriture francophone et la question foncière : l’exemple des géocultures kanak et guin-ewe

2021· article· fr· W4205690649 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Laté Lawson-Hellu

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches Francophones Revue de l Association internationale d étude des littératures et des cultures de l espace francophone (AIELCEF) · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicNew Caledonia Indigenous Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesFrenchArtPhilosophyEthnologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En partant de la question foncière comme base du discours identitaire informé par la subjectivité identitaire et collective de l’écrivain francophone tel Félix Couchoro, au Togo, ou telle Déwé Gorodé, en Nouvelle-Calédonie, il devient possible de formuler chez Félix Couchoro une identité « francophone » qui se définit en opposition au fondement historique et colonial de telle définition. Chez les deux écrivains s’activent ainsi les torts de l’histoire coloniale à l’encontre de la « terre » qui porte l’individu et sa conception, ontologique, de soi. Les motifs culturels, telle la culture de l’igname et son symbolisme socio-discursif et métaphysique, chez Déwé Gorodé et dans la culture kanak, en Nouvelle-Calédonie, ou le couscous traditionnel, yèkè-yèkè, et son symbolisme historique pour le peuple Guin du Sud-est du Togo, chez Félix Couchoro, deviennent les lieux sémiotiques, géoculturels, de ce discours identitaire francophone à conceptualiser dans le sens de ses subjectivités d’intelligibilité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.022
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches Francophones Revue de l Association internationale d étude des littératures et des cultures de l espace francophone (AIELCEF)Same topicNew Caledonia Indigenous StudiesFrench-language works237,207