Details of Headdresses and Diadems from Novozavedennoe-II Barrow Cemetery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the article is published the gold jewelry from the Early Scythian barrow cemetery Novo-zavedennoe-II in Central Ciscaucasia (Stavropol Region). It has been suggested that these finds were the parts of head's jewelry. In Novozavedennoe-II, obviously, were buried group of clan leaders who headed one of the militarized tribal alliance, which settled in the Ciscaucasia steppes after Near East campaigns. The relative chronology of the site covers the interval between the third quarter 7th century BC and the second quarter 6th century BC. In barrow No. 1 were found the gold sewn-on plaques in the form of rosettes and two types of pendants, which could be adornments of a ceremonial headdress made in the traditions of the Near East palace fashion. The ribbon diadems decorated of sewn-on plaques in the form of stylized lying feline predators obviously were in the Barrows No. 3 and 16. The decorations from the mound No. 3 were made with using soldering and granulation, obviously in Western Asia. A set of sewn-on decorations from mound No. 16 were made using the stamp technique, it's possible, by a captive jeweler at the field headquarters of a Scythian chief. Especially important is the find in barrow No. 16 of a gold beads distributor, which has analo-gies in the tomb I in Nimrud. Obviously, gold female jewelry connected with Assyrian royal court get to the Scythian tombs at the end of the 7th century BC in time of the downfall of the Assyrian empire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.099 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".