Bibliographic record
Abstract
Book reviewed in this article: The Best Man for the Job: Joe Fratesi and the Politics of Sault Ste. Marie By harvey r. Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship By will kymlicka. Pulling Against Gravity: Economic Development in New Brunswick During the McKenna Years By donald J. savoie. Supreme Injustice: How the High Court Hijacked Election 2000 By alan dershowitz. Shattering the Myths: Women in Academe By judith glazer‐raymo. The Handbook of Canadian Public Administration Edited by Christopher dunn. The Co‐op Alternative: Civil Society and the Future of Public Services. Monographs on Canadian Public Administration ‐ No. 26 Edited by john restaskis and evert a. lindquist. The Perception of Risk Edited by paul slovic. Public‐Sector Labour Relations in an Era of Restraint and Restructuring Edited Eugene swimmer Don Mills, Ont. Poverty Inequality and Health: An International Perspective Edited by david leon and gill walt.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.065 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".