MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4205695980 · doi:10.1093/pch/8.8.512

<italic>Haemophilus influenzae</italic> type b cases in 2001–2002

2003· article· en· W4205695980 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
monitors and staff the investigators

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBacterial Infections and Vaccines
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHaemophilus influenzaeMedicineVirologyBiologyGeneticsBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After case totals of Haemophilus influenzae type b reached a historic low of four in 2000, the total ballooned to 16 cases in 2001, the largest number since 1995. The situation was somewhat better in 2002, with 10 cases recorded. Reasons for the 26 cases during 2001 to 2002 included parent refusal of immunization in seven instances (27%). Six of these children had severe illnesses, with meningitis (4) or epiglottitis (2). One child had complications of meningitis that included bilateral hearing loss, hemiparesis and developmental delay. Among the 26 total cases, two died of Haemophilus influenzae type b infection. Ten cases occurred among children too young to have completed the primary immunization series. Only three apparently normal children developed infection despite three to four previous doses of Pentacel vaccine (Aventis Pasteur Limited, Canada) (2001 – one instance, 2002 –two instances), an experience similar to previous years, including 2000. Vaccine effectiveness remains high, with no apparent effect of concurrent administration of other vaccines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicBacterial Infections and Vaccines→French-language works237,207→