Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stéphane Castonguay and Michèle Dagenais, eds., Metropolitan Natures: Environmental Histories of Montreal, reviewed by Jennifer Bonnell Trevor R. Peck, Light from Ancient Campfires: Archaeological Evidence for Native Lifeways on the Northern Plains, reviewed by Ted Binnema R. Blake Brown, A Trying Question: The Jury in Nineteenth-Century Canada, reviewed by Allyson N. May Janet Miron, Prisons, Asylums, and the Public: Institutional Visiting in the Nineteenth Century, reviewed by Geoffrey Reaume Alan Gordon, The Hero and the Historians: Historiography and the Uses of Jacques Cartier, reviewed by Ronald Rudin Peter Campbell, Rose Henderson: A Woman for the People, reviewed by David Frank Steven High, ed., Occupied St John's: A Social History of a City at War, 1939–1945, reviewed by Jeff Keshen Roger Litwiller, Warships of the Bay of Quinte, reviewed by Roger Sarty Karen Dubinsky, Catherine Krull, Susan Lord, Sean Mills, and Scott Rutherford, eds., New World Coming: The Sixties and Global Consciousness, reviewed by Dominique Clément Benjamin Isitt, Militant Minority: British Columbia Workers and the Rise of a New Left, 1948–1972, reviewed by Andrew Parnaby David Frank and Nicole Lang, Labour Landmarks in New Brunswick / Lieux historiques ouvriers au Nouveaus Brunswick, reviewed by Steven High
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.462 | 0.435 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".