The role of ecology and geography in the evolution of habitat isolation and sexual isolation among sister species of host-plant-specific insects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract While ecology and geography can play important roles in the evolution of reproductive isolation across the speciation continuum, the few studies to date examining their relative contributions have largely focused on the early stages of speciation. Studies exploring the evolution of multiple reproductive barriers among divergent lineages, where speciation is nearly complete, are also needed to gain a fuller understanding of the mechanisms promoting and constraining the speciation process. We examine the later stage of speciation by comparing the strength of habitat isolation and sexual isolation among closely related species of gall-forming wasps in the genus Belonocnema experiencing divergent ecologies due to different hos plant use and variable rates of migration due to geography. We found that the strength of both habitat isolation and sexual isolation is lowest among allopatric species pairs with the same host plant association, followed by allopatric species with different host plant association, and highest between sympatric species with different host-plant associations. This pattern strongly suggests that both ecology due to divergent host use, and geography contribute to the evolution of these two reproductive barriers. Notably, reproductive character displacement contributes to nearly half of the strength of both habitat isolation and sexual isolation in sympatry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".