MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205770184 · doi:10.4018/ijsi.289170

KDA-Based WKNN-SVM Method for Activity Recognition System From Smartphone Data

2022· article· en· W4205770184 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Software Innovation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupport vector machineAccelerometerArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)GyroscopeLinear discriminant analysisKernel (algebra)Activity recognitionProcess (computing)Machine learningData miningEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article describes a new scheme for a physical activity recognition process based on carried smartphone embedded sensors, such as accelerometer and gyroscope. For this purpose, the WKNN-SVM algorithm has been proposed to predict physical activities such as walking, standing, or sitting. It combines weighted k-nearest neighbours (WKNN) and support vector machines (SVM). The signals generated from the sensors are processed and then reduced using the kernel discriminant analysis (KDA) by selecting the best discriminating components of the data. The authors performed different tests on four public datasets where the participants performed different activities carrying a smartphone. They demonstrated through several experiments that KDA/WKNN-SVM algorithm can improve the overall recognition performances and has a higher recognition rate than the baseline methods using the machine learning and deep learning algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.801

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it