MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205807183 · doi:10.2514/6.2022-0165

Analysis and Design Optimization of a Magnetorheological Elastomer-based Vibration Absorber for Maximum Vibration Attenuation of a Main Structure

2022· article· en· W4205807183 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration Control and Rheological Fluids
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDynamic Vibration AbsorberMagnetorheological fluidVibrationSequential quadratic programmingMagnetorheological elastomerOptimal designFinite element methodAttenuationBeam (structure)Structural engineeringMaterials scienceMagnetic fieldAcousticsEngineeringComputer scienceQuadratic programmingPhysicsOpticsDamper

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

View Video Presentation: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2022-0165.vid Adaptive tuned vibration absorbers (ATVAs) can be effectively utilized in attenuation of unwanted vibrations on a broad range of structures and machinery. The present study, investigates the performance and design optimization of a newly introduced magnetorheological elastomer based adaptive vibration absorber (MRE-AVA) attached to a beam-like host structure. This light-weight vibration absorber consists of a sandwich beam treated with an MRE core layer and two electromagnets installed at both free ends which act as active masses and also provide the required magnetic field for activation of MRE. The host structure considered here is a fixed-fixed aluminum beam clamped at the center to the designed MRE-AVA. First, the mechanical finite element (FE) and magnetic models of the vibration absorber assembly and the host structure are developed. Then, the optimization problem is formulated subjected to mechanical stress and geometrical constraints, with the objective of maximizing the vibration attenuation of the host structure based on driving point mobility analysis. The Sequential Quadratic Programming (SQP) optimization method is utilized to find sub-optimal design candidates for the MRE-AVA. The best design candidate for the vibration absorber provides 99% and 64% decrease in the level of mobility compared to the main structure without absorber around the first and second modes, respectively, while maintaining nearly 16 % adaptive frequency range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score0.808

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it