MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205811441 · doi:10.7227/jace.12.1.9

Reviews: NIACE Lifelines in Adult Learning, Web-Based Distance Education for Adults, Learning Journeys: A Handbook for Tutors and Managers in Adult Education Working with People with Mental Health Difficulties, the Learning Brain: Lessons for Education, Teaching Adult English Language Learners, Science in the Countryside. Lifelong Learning for Ecological Citizenship, the Tertiary Moment: What Road to Inclusive Higher Education?, Closing the Equity Gap: The Impact of Widening Participation Strategies in the UK and the USA, Adults in Higher Education – Learning from Experience in the New Europe, 14–19 Education Policy, Leadership and Learning, Demography and Older Learners: Approaches to a New Policy Challenge

2006· article· en· W4205811441 on OpenAlexaff
Ralph Catts, Victoria O’Donnell, Tom Schuller, Ira Papageorgiou, Dominic J. McCafferty, Elizabeth Aitkenhead, Ralf St. Clair, Hans G. Schuetze, Margery McMahon, Brian Findsen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Adult and Continuing Education · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Learning Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdult educationMental healthDistance educationAdult LearningLifelong learningPsychologyPedagogyEducational technologyMedical educationSociologyMathematics educationMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Adult and Continuing EducationSame topicHigher Education Learning PracticesFrench-language works237,207