Upper Plate Structure and Megathrust Properties in the Shumagin Gap Near the July 2020 M7.8 Simeonof Event
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Subduction zone architecture and properties are thought to control megathrust slip behavior, but few constraints on crustal structure and megathrust properties are available at sufficient resolution and depth, hindering understanding of linkages between structure and behavior. Here we present a P ‐wave seismic velocity model based on wide‐angle seismic data integrated with collocated reflection imaging in the weakly coupled Shumagin Gap in the Alaska subduction zone, where a M7.8 occurred in July 2020. We show that this earthquake occurred near and below the Moho of the overriding plate where the megathrust is characterized by a 3‐ to 5‐km‐thick reflection band interpreted to represent tectonic mixing. The rheological heterogeneity of the plate boundary near and below the Moho could account for abundant interplate seismicity, repeated M7.x events, and patchiness of the 2020 rupture. Velocity variations in the overriding continental crust imply changes in rigidity that could further influence megathrust slip.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".