A retinal deep phenotyping<sup>TM</sup> platform to predict the cerebral amyloid PET status in older adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background As the only optically accessible part of the central nervous system, the retina represents an intriguing opportunity for the detection of biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). This study evaluated the performance of the Retinal Deep Phenotyping TM platform, a digital biomarker platform comprising a hyperspectral retinal camera and image analysis algorithms, for the detection of likely positron‐emission tomography (PET) amyloid status (negative or positive) in older adults. A set of phenotypic features that correlates with the cerebral amyloid status as determined by amyloid PET scan were identified and used to train a classifying algorithm. Method Hyperspectral retinal images acquired with a Mydriatic Hyperspectral Retinal Camera from 194 participants (age ≥ 50 years), including cognitively normal and cognitively impaired (mild cognitive impairment and dementia) across 5 imaging sites were processed in order to train the model. Of these 194 participants, 73 individuals (38%) were amyloid‐positive, as confirmed by unanimous readings of PET scans by a panel of 3 expert reviewers. The pre‐processed hyperspectral images were segmented into various anatomical sites, and a texture‐based approach was used to extract several thousands of spatial‐spectral features. The most relevant features for the classification task were selected using a minimum redundancy maximum relevance (MRMR) algorithm and used to train a linear support vector machine (SVM) classifier. A nested, cross‐validation technique was used to evaluate the performance of the classifier. Result The resulting model based on the 17 most significant features showed high performance to discriminate between amyloid positive and negative subjects with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC ROC ) of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83 – 0.92). Conclusion The Retinal Deep Phenotyping TM platform shows promise for detecting the likely cerebral amyloid PET status in adults 50 years and older from a simple, non‐invasive retinal scan and could provide an accessible means to identify individuals with abnormal cerebral amyloid in a clinical or drug development context. This phenotyping platform provides a flexible approach that could also be used for the detection of multiple biomarkers involved in cognitive decline from the same hyperspectral images of the retina.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".