MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205816441 · doi:10.1109/tim.2021.3135537

Multirate Sensor Fusion in the Presence of Irregular Measurements and Time-Varying Time Delays Using Synchronized, Neural, Extended Kalman Filters

2021· article· en· W4205816441 on OpenAlexafffund
Jingyi Wang, Yousef Alipouri, Biao Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsKalman filterControl theory (sociology)Artificial neural networkExtended Kalman filterState vectorSensor fusionComputer scienceSoft sensorCompensation (psychology)Filter (signal processing)State variableFusionMean squared errorProcess (computing)AlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMathematicsComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sensor fusion plays a critical role in improving estimation accuracy of process quality variables. In this article, the dual, neural, extended Kalman filter (DNEKF) and the state model compensation neural, extended Kalman filter (SNEKF) are synthesized to compensate for modeling errors in the extended Kalman filter (EKF)-based multirate sensor fusion. Specifically, fusion is performed in the presence of irregularly sampled, slow-rate measurements with time-varying time delays. The proposed algorithm estimates the state and neural network parameters simultaneously through state vector augmentation. The estimated parameters of the state model compensation neural network (SNN) are shared between the DNEKF and SNEKF. It is demonstrated through two numerical examples that the proposed algorithm effectively reduces the estimation error under different conditions. In addition, it successfully improves the critical industrial quality variable estimation accuracy from the fast-rate soft sensor for over 20%, in terms of the mean squared error, demonstrating its advantages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.668
Threshold uncertainty score0.582

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207