Caching in Dynamic Environments: A Near-Optimal Online Learning Approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rapid growth of rich multimedia data in today’s Internet, especially video traffic, has challenged the content delivery networks (CDNs). Caching serves as an important means to reduce user access latency so as to enable faster content downloads. Motivated by the dynamic nature of the real-world edge traces, this paper introduces a <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">provably well</i> online caching policy in dynamic environments where: 1) the popularity is highly dynamic; 2) no regular stochastic pattern can model this dynamic evaluation process. First, we design an online optimization framework, which aims to minimize the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">dynamic regret</i> that finds the distance between an online caching policy and the best dynamic policy in hindsight. Second, we propose a dynamic online learning method to solve the non-stationary caching problem formulated in the previous framework. Compared to the linear dynamic regret of previous methods, our proposal is proved to achieve a <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">sublinear dynamic regret</i> , from which it is guaranteed to be nearly optimal. We verify the design using both synthetic and real-world traces: the proposed policy achieves the best performance in the synthetic traces with different levels of dynamicity, which verifies the dynamic adaptation; our proposal consistently achieves at least 9.4% improvement than the baselines, including LRU, LFU, Static Online Learning based replacement, and Deep Reinforcement Learning based replacement, in random edge areas from real-world traces (from iQIYI), further verifying the effectiveness and robustness on the edge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it