Humanized <i>CYP2C19</i> transgenic mouse as an animal model of cerebellar ataxia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background Animal models are essential for understanding etiology and pathophysiology of movement disorders. Previously, we have found that mice transgenic for the human CYP2C19 gene, expressed in the liver and developing brain, exhibit altered neurodevelopment associated with impairments of their motor function and emotionality. Objectives To characterize motoric phenotype of the CYP2C19 transgenic mice and validate its usefulness as an animal model of ataxia. Methods The rotarod and beam-walking tests were utilized to quantify the functional alterations induced by motoric phenotype. Dopaminergic system was assessed by tyrosine hydroxylase immunohistochemistry and by chromatographic quantification of the whole-brain dopamine levels. Beam-walking test was also repeated after the treatment with the dopamine receptor antagonists, ecopipam and raclopride. The volumes of 20 brain regions in the CYP2C19 transgenic mice and controls were quantified by 9.4T gadolinium-enhanced postmortem structural neuroimaging. Results CYP2C19 transgenic mice were found to exhibit abnormal, unilateral ataxia-like gait, clasping reflex and 5.6-fold more paw-slips using the beam-walking test ( p <0.0001, n=89); the phenotype was more pronounced in younger animals. Hyperdopaminergism was observed in the CYP2C19 mice; however, the motoric impairment was not ameliorated by dopamine receptor antagonists and there was also no midbrain dopamine neuron loss in CYP2C19 mice. However, in these mice, cerebellar volume was drastically decreased (11.8% [95%CI: −14.7, −9.0], q <0.0001, n=59), whereas a moderate decrease in hippocampal volume was observed (−4.2% [95%CI: −6.4%, −1.9%], q =0.015, n=59). Conclusions Humanized CYP2C19 transgenic mice exhibit altered motoric function and functional motoric impairments; this phenotype is likely caused by an aberrant cerebellar development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".