MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205854808 · doi:10.4000/books.pufc.40625

“If your daughters are inclined to love reading, do not check their Inclination”: Passing on knowledge and advice among elite women in eighteenth-century Scotland

2017· book-chapter· en· W4205854808 on OpenAlexaff
Anne Mckim

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Franche-Comté eBooks · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicScottish History and National Identity
Canadian institutionsJaneway Children's Health and Rehabilitation Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEliteAdvice (programming)Reading (process)PsychologySocial psychologyDevelopmental psychologyGender studiesSociologyPolitical scienceComputer scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction The relative lack of research on “the role of aristocratic women in advancing their children’s education” in eighteenth-century Britain has been remarked by Clarissa Campbell-Orr in her study, Wollstonecraft’s Daughters. This paper makes a modest contribution towards addressing this gap, by considering the experience of some elite Scottish women, as related in their familial letters and memoirs. Studies have established the importance of letters, and of female epistolary networks...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires de Franche-Comté eBooksSame topicScottish History and National IdentityFrench-language works237,207