MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4205855380 · doi:10.1101/2022.01.18.476764

pyNeurode: a real-time neural signal processing framework

2022· preprint· en· W4205855380 on OpenAlexaff
Wing-kin Tam, Matthew F. Nolan

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Centre
FundersSimons Initiative for the Developing Brain
KeywordsSpike sortingComputer sciencePython (programming language)Spike (software development)SortingBrain–computer interfaceGraphical user interfaceDecoding methodsSoftwareProcess (computing)Latency (audio)Computer hardwareAlgorithmNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Accurate decoding of neural signals often requires assigning extracellular waveforms acquired on the same electrode to their originating neurons, a process known as spike sorting. While many offline sorters are available, accurate online sorting of spikes with many channels is still a challenging problem. Existing online sorters either use simple algorithms with low accuracy, can only process a handful of channels, or depend on a complex runtime environment that is difficult to set up. We have developed a state-of-the-art online spike sorting platform in Python that enables large-scale, fully automatic real-time spike sorting and decoding on hundreds of channels. Our system is cross-platform and works seamlessly with the Open Ephys suite of open-source hardware and software widely used in many neuroscience laboratories worldwide. It also comes with a user-friendly graphical user interface to monitor the cluster quality, spike waveforms and neuronal firing rate. Our platform has comparable accuracy to offline sorters and can achieve an end-to-end sorting latency of around 160 ms for 128-channel signals. It will be useful for research in fundamental neuroscience, closed-loop feedback neuromodulation and brain-computer interfaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicNeural dynamics and brain function→French-language works237,207→