Food Science Education Publications and Websites
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jim Bird The purpose of this column is to highlight innovative publications and websites in food science education and allied topics. If you know of a website or a recent publication that you believe other readers would like to know about, please submit the full text of the article or the URL for the website and an annotation of not more than 125 words. We welcome your resources and comments on this column. Material should be submitted to: Jim Bird, Science & Engineering Center,Fogler Library, Univ. of Maine, Orono, ME 04469–5729, or e-mail to Jim.Bird@umit.maine.edu. If e-mailing, please put “JFSE submission” in the subject line. The authors examine biology textbooks for undergraduate courses in relation to the attrition of biology majors. They look at how the textbooks portray the scientific process through illustrations and find that “On average, multistep scientific investigations were presented in fewer than 5% of the hundreds of figures in each book.” (p. 143). The authors theorize that increasing illustrations of multistep scientific processes in biology textbooks will support undergraduate interest in biology and will lead to more analytical thinkers. This is an important paper for all undergraduate biology teachers to read and contemplate. The Advanced Life Science Program (ALS) is comprised of 3 science-intensive agriculture courses: ALS: Animals, ALS: Plants & Soils, and ALS: Foods. When a student takes an ALS course they have the opportunity to earn science credit for their high school diploma as well as dual credit through Purdue Univ. To assist instructors with teaching the ALS courses, the ALS website has been developed and contains information an ALS instructor needs as it pertains to dual credit and the ALS Program. One unique feature that is available on the website is additional instructional materials for instructor to access to assist them in teaching the courses. Additional materials that can be found on the website include: instructional videos, labs, worksheets, and activities. Reviewed by Megan Anderson, ALS Program Assistant and Levon T. Esters, ALS Program Coordinator, Purdue Univ., Dept. of Youth Development and Agricultural Education, 615 W. State St., West Lafayette, IN 47907–2053. Using focus groups comprised of students, teachers, and Cooking with Kids food educators, the authors show how qualitative methods can be used to provide input into the effectiveness of the Cooking with Kids program in Santa Fe, New Mexico. Focus group members were asked about their classroom experience, student perspectives on the program, and connections with academic subjects among other questions. Based on their results, the authors conclude that focus groups are a useful and effective tool to gain insight into the program. For information on the Cooking with Kids program go to: http://cookingwithkids.net/ (accessed 2/16/2012) Working with 40 students at a technical secondary dairy school in Ioannina, Greece, the authors used an Educational Virtual Environment (EVE) on milk pasteurization to see whether Structure of the Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) taxonomy could be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the EVE. “SOLO provides a systematic way of describing how a learner's performance grows in complexity when mastering many academic tasks.” (p. 238) Based on analysis of the results students did “ … shift from lower to higher SOLO levels … .” (p. 244). The Think&EatGreen@School project at the Univ. of British Columbia (UBC) hopes “ … to foster food citizenship in the City of Vancouver and to develop a model of sustainable institutional food systems in public schools.” (p. 764) The authors put their project into context by examining global food systems in light of food security issues. They discuss environmental impacts of food systems and look at the ways that a concerted effort by their team of university researchers, undergraduate and graduate students, and “community-based researchers and organizations” (p. 763) working with Vancouver schools can address a variety of food related issues revolving around food sustainability, food security, food sovereignty, and food citizenship. The authors discuss the conceptual framework of the project, its history and governance structure and organization, community impact projects, and project challenges. The following link to a UBC public affairs story provides information on this project: http://www.publicaffairs.ubc.ca/2010/06/03/helping-students-chew-over-their-food-sources/ (accessed 2/16/2012).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it