Food Science Education Publications and Websites
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Jim Bird The purpose of this column is to highlight innovative publications and websites in food science education and allied topics. If you know of a website or a recent publication that you believe other readers would like to know about, please submit the full text of the article or the URL for the website and an annotation of not more than 125 words. We welcome your resources and comments on this column. Material should be submitted to: Jim Bird, Science & Engineering Center,Fogler Library, Univ. of Maine, Orono, ME 04469–5729, or e-mail to Jim.Bird@umit.maine.edu. If e-mailing, please put “JFSE submission” in the subject line. The authors examine biology textbooks for undergraduate courses in relation to the attrition of biology majors. They look at how the textbooks portray the scientific process through illustrations and find that “On average, multistep scientific investigations were presented in fewer than 5% of the hundreds of figures in each book.” (p. 143). The authors theorize that increasing illustrations of multistep scientific processes in biology textbooks will support undergraduate interest in biology and will lead to more analytical thinkers. This is an important paper for all undergraduate biology teachers to read and contemplate. The Advanced Life Science Program (ALS) is comprised of 3 science-intensive agriculture courses: ALS: Animals, ALS: Plants & Soils, and ALS: Foods. When a student takes an ALS course they have the opportunity to earn science credit for their high school diploma as well as dual credit through Purdue Univ. To assist instructors with teaching the ALS courses, the ALS website has been developed and contains information an ALS instructor needs as it pertains to dual credit and the ALS Program. One unique feature that is available on the website is additional instructional materials for instructor to access to assist them in teaching the courses. Additional materials that can be found on the website include: instructional videos, labs, worksheets, and activities. Reviewed by Megan Anderson, ALS Program Assistant and Levon T. Esters, ALS Program Coordinator, Purdue Univ., Dept. of Youth Development and Agricultural Education, 615 W. State St., West Lafayette, IN 47907–2053. Using focus groups comprised of students, teachers, and Cooking with Kids food educators, the authors show how qualitative methods can be used to provide input into the effectiveness of the Cooking with Kids program in Santa Fe, New Mexico. Focus group members were asked about their classroom experience, student perspectives on the program, and connections with academic subjects among other questions. Based on their results, the authors conclude that focus groups are a useful and effective tool to gain insight into the program. For information on the Cooking with Kids program go to: http://cookingwithkids.net/ (accessed 2/16/2012) Working with 40 students at a technical secondary dairy school in Ioannina, Greece, the authors used an Educational Virtual Environment (EVE) on milk pasteurization to see whether Structure of the Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) taxonomy could be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the EVE. “SOLO provides a systematic way of describing how a learner's performance grows in complexity when mastering many academic tasks.” (p. 238) Based on analysis of the results students did “ … shift from lower to higher SOLO levels … .” (p. 244). The Think&EatGreen@School project at the Univ. of British Columbia (UBC) hopes “ … to foster food citizenship in the City of Vancouver and to develop a model of sustainable institutional food systems in public schools.” (p. 764) The authors put their project into context by examining global food systems in light of food security issues. They discuss environmental impacts of food systems and look at the ways that a concerted effort by their team of university researchers, undergraduate and graduate students, and “community-based researchers and organizations” (p. 763) working with Vancouver schools can address a variety of food related issues revolving around food sustainability, food security, food sovereignty, and food citizenship. The authors discuss the conceptual framework of the project, its history and governance structure and organization, community impact projects, and project challenges. The following link to a UBC public affairs story provides information on this project: http://www.publicaffairs.ubc.ca/2010/06/03/helping-students-chew-over-their-food-sources/ (accessed 2/16/2012).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle