P.055 Clinical and Electrophysiological characteristics of anti-nodal/paranodal antibodies in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: CIDP is an autoimmune polyneuropathy. Antibodies against the Node of Ranvier have been described, NF155,NF140/186 and contactin-1. Methods: A retrospective review of patients with CIDP who tested positive for anti-nodal/paranodal antibodies via Western blot were evaluated. We have included 20 sero-negative CIDP patients. All patients met definite or probable EFNS criteria. clinical, electrophysiological data and response to treatment were obtained. Results: Forty-five patients tested positive for the antibodies. Sixteen were positive for NF155, 11 for NF140, 5 for CNTN1,11 were double positive for NF155 and NF140, and 3 were triple positive for NF155, NF140 and CNTN1. Age of onset was similar in both seronegative (53.9 ± 3.1 yrs.) versus seropositive (52.3 ± 2.4 yrs.). Chronic presentation manifested in 85% of seronegative, 80% of seropositive patients.Intrestingly,all triple-positive patients presented with a more acute presentation (i.e,<8 wks.) 7/20 seronegative (35%),1/16 NF155, 6/11 NF140,1/5 contactin, 2/11 of double-positive, 3/3 of triple-positive (28%,13/46) responded to IVIg. Conclusions: No major clinical or electrophysiological differences between groups. triple-positive patients showed 100% response to IVIg.These results cast doubt on the specificity of the Western blot as a clinico-electrophysiologic discriminator. Future testing with cell-based assays will likely provide a robust measure that will guide treatment decision.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".