MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205865692 · doi:10.1002/evan.21937

Towards an interdisciplinary perspective for the study of human expansions and biocultural diversity in the Americas

2022· review· en· W4205865692 on OpenAlexaff
Lumila Paula Menéndez, Kathleen S. Paul, Constanza de la Fuente Castro, Tatiana Ferreira de Almeida, Miguel Delgado, Gonzalo Figueiro, Kelsey Jorgensen, Susan Kuzminsky, María Clara López‐Sosa, Johanna Nichols, Mirjana Roksandić, G. Richard Scott, Dennis H. O’Rourke, Mark Hübbe

Bibliographic record

VenueEvolutionary Anthropology Issues News and Reviews · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
FundersRheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Diversity (politics)AnthropologyGeographyEvolutionary biologyEnvironmental ethicsSociologyHistoryEpistemologyBiologyPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest. Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed for this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.221
GPT teacher head0.546
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEvolutionary Anthropology Issues News and ReviewsSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207