MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205869308 · doi:10.2118/208601-pa

Scale Up of Pore-Network Models into Reservoir Scale: Optimization of Inflow Control Devices Placement

2021· article· en· W4205869308 on OpenAlexaff
Farzad Bashtani, Mazda Irani, Apostolos Kantzas

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelative permeabilityInflowPermeability (electromagnetism)Petroleum engineeringReservoir simulationCapillary pressureMechanicsDrawdown (hydrology)Volumetric flow rateWell controlGeologyEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceSoil sciencePorous mediumPorosityGeotechnical engineeringChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Improvements to more advanced tools, such as inflow control devices (ICDs), create a high drawdown regime close to wellbores. Gas liberation within the formation occurs when the drawdown pressure is reduced below the bubblepoint pressure, which in turn reduces oil mobility by reducing its relative permeability, and potentially reducing oil flow. The key input in any reservoir modeling to compare the competition between gas and liquid flow toward ICDs is the relative permeability of different phases. Pore-network modeling (PNM) has been used to compute the relative permeability curves of oil, gas, and water based on the pore structure of the formation. In this paper, we explain the variability of pore structure on its relative permeability, and for a similar formation and identical permeability, we explain how other factors, such as connectivity and throat radius distribution, can vary the characteristic curves. By using a boundary element method, we also incorporate the expected relative permeability and capillary pressure curves into the modeling. The results show that such variability in the pore network has a less than 10% impact on production gas rates, but its effect on oil production can be significant. Another important finding of such modeling is that providing the PNM-created relative permeabilities may provide totally different direction on setting the operational constraints. For example, in the case studied in this paper, PNM-created relative permeability curves suggest that a reduction of flowing bottomhole pressure (FBHP) increases the oil rate, but for the case modeled with a Corey correlation, changes in FBHP will not create any uplift. The results of such work show the importance of PNM in well completion design and probabilistic analysis of the performance, and can be extended based on different factors of the reservoir in future research. Although PNM has been widely used to study the multiphase flow in porous media in academia, the application of such modeling in reservoir and production engineering is quite narrow. In this study, we develop a framework that shows the general user the importance of PNM simulation and its implementation in day-to-day modeling. With this approach, the PNM can be used not just to provide relative permeability or capillary pressure curves on a core or pore- scale, but to preform simulations at the wellbore or reservoir scale as well to optimize the current completions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score0.430

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE JournalSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207