MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Textural features and chemical evolution of Ta-Nb-W-Sn oxides in the Jianfengling Deposit, South China

2022· article· en· W4205876156 on OpenAlexaff
Xi Diao, Mingqian Wu, Dehui Zhang, Jianping Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueOre Geology Reviews · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCassiteriteColumbiteGeologyGeochemistryTopazMineralization (soil science)PegmatiteWolframiteBiotiteTinPaleontologyMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The contribution of magmatic and hydrothermal processes to the formation of rare metal minerals in highly-evolved peraluminous systems has received great attention, yet is still debatable. The Ta-Nb-W-Sn mineralization at the Jianfengling deposit, in the Nanling range of Southeast China, occurs in a peraluminous intrusion that comprises three rock phases, namely a biotite granite, a zinnwaldite granite, and a topaz zinnwaldite granite from bottom to top. Rare metal ores occur as disseminations constrained to the zinnwaldite granite and topaz zinnwaldite granite. In this study, textural and chemical analyses of Ta-Nb-W-Sn ore minerals and zinnwaldite were conducted to address the origin of rare metal mineralization in the context of the magmatic-hydrothermal evolution at Jianfengling. Four stages of mineralizing events were identified. The Stage-I mineralization is represented by columbite-(Mn) that occurs mainly as cores overgrown by aggregates of Ta-Nb-Sn-W oxides, but also as individual crystals. The Stage II is represented by CGM overgrowths that have partially resorbed or replaced the Stage-I columbite-(Mn). The Stage-II overgrowths are much more enriched in Ta than the Stage-I columbite-(Mn). Cassiterite manifests the Stage-III mineralizing event, and occurs as replacement of or overgrowths on the Stage-II CGM aggregates. The Stage-IV mineralization is characterized by formation of wolframite that has replaced and/or overgrown on the Stage-II and –III minerals. The equilibrium boundaries shown between Stage-I columbite-(Mn) and magmatic zinnwaldite, and the gradual or no compositional zoning that the Stage-I columbite-(Mn) cores exhibit, suggest that the Stage-I CGM is magmatic. Because of the low solubility of Ta in aqueous fluids and the evidence for metasomatism observed in this study, the Ta-rich Stage-II CGM overgrowths were interpreted to have crystallized from a magmatic-hydrothermal, transitional fluid (i.e., hydrosilicate liquid) that lies compositionally in between silicate melts and aqueous fluids, and which was able to cause significant Ta enrichment, and in turn a strong decrease of the whole-rock Nb/Ta values. That the Stage-II CGM were sequentially replaced by cassiterite and wolframite marked a metasomatic Sn-W mineralizing event that postdated Ta-Nb mineralization. Fluids responsible for this Sn-W mineralization could be a compositionally evolved fluid derived from the same transitional fluid that led to metasomatic Ta-Nb mineralization, or infiltrating fluids that precipitated Sn and W, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOre Geology ReviewsSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207