Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ed Cherney and I were appointed Co- Editors-in-Chief of this Magazine with effect 1 January 2008. In mid-January we met with the outgoing Editor-in-Chief John Densley, at his home outside Toronto, and were instructed on many important aspects of the job, at the nuts-and-bolts level. I co-edited the May/June issue with John, Ed did likewise for the July/August issue, and thereafter we went solo, editing alternate issues. The appointment of two Co-Editors-in-Chief, rather than one Editor-in-Chief, was one of the concerns raised during the 2012 IEEE Periodicals Review and Advisory Committee (PRAC) five-yearly review of the Magazine, specifically that such an arrangement would lead to substantial duplication of editorial effort. We convinced the committee that this is not the case and that the arrangement offers the advantage of helping to ensure continuity of publication should one of the Co-Editors become incapacitated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it