MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205883340 · doi:10.30824/2106-9

2021 Franz Volhard Award, International Society of Hypertension. From RAAS, Endothelin, Immunity and Genes to Vascular Remodeling in Hypertension

2021· article· en· W4205883340 on OpenAlexaff
Ernesto L. Schiffrin, Mortimer Davis

Bibliographic record

VenueHypertension News · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAtherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases
Canadian institutionsJewish General HospitalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndothelin receptorEndothelin 1Internal medicineImmunityMedicineImmunologyImmune systemReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I felt extremely happy and honored being selected as the 2021 Volhard Award of the International Society of Hypertension, and as well grateful to the ISH Awards Committee.Dr. Franz Volhard (1872-1950) was one of the most prominent nephrologists and academic physicians in Germany in the first half of the 20 th Century, having among other achievements classified renal disease in "nephrosis", "nephritis", and renal vascular disease (renovascular hypertension).He also realized that "malignant pale hypertension was accompanied by vessel wall destruction, vasospasm, ischemia, and eventually irreversible organ (renal) damage.…" 1 distinguishing it from "benign" hypertension.Accordingly, his ideas fed directly into my lecture for the Franz Volhard Award at the virtual 2021 ESH/ ISH OnAir joint meeting, on Vascular remodeling in hypertension, the major goal of my research.But I felt also happy to receive this honor named in memory of Franz Volhard, whose courage as Chair of Medicine in Frankfurt University led to his being expelled by the Nazis in 1938 because of his vocal opposition to the regime, only to be reinstated in 1945 after the fall of Naziism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.268

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0800.053

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueHypertension NewsSame topicAtherosclerosis and Cardiovascular DiseasesFrench-language works237,207