Buard, Jean-Luc. Culture médiatique et presse numérisée. Médiasphère des feuilletons-nouvelles de Marie Aycard (1794-1859)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
De quoi parle-t-on quand on parle de littérature ?C'est la question qu'on pourrait se poser, en paraphrasant de manière guère originale (cela a été fait dix mille fois) le titre du célèbre recueil de nouvelles de Raymond Carver pour parler de ce livre de Jean-Luc Buard, rédacteur en chef de la revue Le Rocambole et explorateur passionné des basfonds de la production populaire.Dans ce cas particulier, la paraphrase usée peut toutefois paraître particulièrement appropriée, justement en raison de son omniprésence.C'est en effet l'histoire d'un auteur qui fut un temps omniprésent -et qui a depuis complètement disparu de la mémoire historique -que retrace ce livre, tout en proposant un discours on ne peut plus actuel sur les frontières du champ littéraire, l'idée qu'on s'en fait traditionnellement et l'influence des nouvelles méthodes de recherche sur sa redéfinition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".