Alpha Power Extended Inverse Weibull Poisson Distribution: Properties, Inference, and Applications to lifetime data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a new four-parameter extended inverse Weibull distribution called Alpha power Extended Inverse Weibull Poisson distribution is introduced using the alpha power Poisson generator. This method adds two shape parameters to a baseline distribution thereby increasing its flexibility and applicability in modeling lifetime data. We study the structural properties of the new distribution such as the mean, variance, quantile function, median, ordinary and incomplete moments, reliability analysis, Lorenz and Bonferroni curves, Renyi entropy, mean waiting time, mean residual life, and order statistics. We use the method of maximum likelihood technique for estimating the model parameters of Alpha power extended inverse Weibull distribution and the corresponding confidence intervals are obtained. The simulation method is carried out to evaluate the performance of the maximum likelihood estimate in terms of their Absolute Bias and Mean Square Error using simulated data. Two lifetime data sets are presented to demonstrate the applicability of the new model and it is found that the new model has superior modeling power when compare to Inverse Weibull distribution, Alpha Power Poisson inverse exponential distribution, Alpha Power Extended Inverse Weibull distribution, and Alpha Power Extended Inverse Exponential distribution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".