MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205898363 · doi:10.18280/rcma.310604

Lattice Parameters, Electronic, and Magnetic Properties of Cubic Perovskite Oxides ARuO3 (A=Sr, Rb): A First‑Principles Study

2021· article· en· W4205898363 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ahmed Memdouh Younsi, Lakhdar Gacem, Mohamed Toufik Soltani

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des composites et des matériaux avancés · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthorhombic crystal systemMagnetic momentTetragonal crystal systemDensity functional theoryCondensed matter physicsCubic crystal systemMaterials scienceDensity of statesFerromagnetismStrontiumElectronic band structureAb initio quantum chemistry methodsRubidiumPerovskite (structure)Crystal structureParamagnetismElectronic structureCrystallographyChemistryComputational chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trioxides of rubidium, strontium, and ruthenium belong to the family of alkali and alkaline earth ruthenates. SrRuO3 crystallizes in various symmetry classes—orthorhombic, tetragonal, or cubic—whereas RbRuO3 is perovskite (cubic) structured and crystallizes only in the cubic space group Pm3¯¯¯m(No. 221). In this study, we investigated the structural stability as well as the electronic and magnetic properties of two cubic perovskites SrRuO3 and RbRuO3. We established the corresponding lattice parameters, magnetic moments, density of states (DOS), and band structures using ab‑initio density‑functional theory (DFT). Both compounds exhibited a metallic ferromagnetic ground state with lattice parameter values between 3.83 and 3.96 Å; RbRuO3 had magnetic moments between 0.29 and 0.34 µBwhereas SrRuO3 had magnetic moments between 1.33 and 1.66 µB. This study paves way for further RbRuO3 research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.303
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue des composites et des matériaux avancésSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207