Lattice Parameters, Electronic, and Magnetic Properties of Cubic Perovskite Oxides ARuO3 (A=Sr, Rb): A First‑Principles Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trioxides of rubidium, strontium, and ruthenium belong to the family of alkali and alkaline earth ruthenates. SrRuO3 crystallizes in various symmetry classes—orthorhombic, tetragonal, or cubic—whereas RbRuO3 is perovskite (cubic) structured and crystallizes only in the cubic space group Pm3¯¯¯m(No. 221). In this study, we investigated the structural stability as well as the electronic and magnetic properties of two cubic perovskites SrRuO3 and RbRuO3. We established the corresponding lattice parameters, magnetic moments, density of states (DOS), and band structures using ab‑initio density‑functional theory (DFT). Both compounds exhibited a metallic ferromagnetic ground state with lattice parameter values between 3.83 and 3.96 Å; RbRuO3 had magnetic moments between 0.29 and 0.34 µBwhereas SrRuO3 had magnetic moments between 1.33 and 1.66 µB. This study paves way for further RbRuO3 research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".