MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4205904037 · doi:10.7202/1083998ar

Pour une lecture queer contrainte de Sphinx d’Anne Garréta : entre clinamen et variables sur le genre

2021· article· fr· W4205904037 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Caroline Lebrec

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes littéraires · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSphinxArtQueerPhilosophySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le titre du premier roman d’Anne Garréta,Sphinx, pose la question de l’énigme et de son réseau indiciel dans le texte par le biais d’une écriture qui efface les traces du genre et de l’identité sexuée dans la langue française pour aller vers le discours du neutre et du non-dit. À partir d’une lecturequeerdeSphinxet de la poétique de l’écriture à contraintes, nous voyons comment la performativité du réseau péritextuel, les contraintes oulipiennes et le dispositif oulipien duclinamenpermettent non pas de résoudre l’énigme mais de révéler le régime énigmatique d’un texte qui se présente sous forme de variables sur le genre et les identités sexuelles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.010
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes littéraires→Same topicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis→French-language works237,207→