MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Rupture d’affiliation et continuité de la tradition chez des jeunes convertis à l’Islam au Québec : Une nouvelle anthropologie de la famille

2022· article· fr· W4205912583 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Géraldine Mossière

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologica · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Society, and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parce qu’elles révèlent les apories des mécanismes de transmission identitaires familiales, les conversions religieuses peuvent donner des indications, informer, voire nuancer les dynamiques générationnelles qui semblent à l’œuvre dans les mouvements actuels de radicalisation. Partant de l’expérience de jeunes Québécois qui ont choisi d’entrer dans l’Islam, nous discutons l’hypothèse de fracture générationnelle (Roy 2002) en examinant les négociations, compromis et ajustements qui composent leurs rapports familiaux, notamment autour de l’enjeu de la célébration de Noël. Nous montrons que la critique morale qui amène les convertis à se dissocier de l’héritage identitaire légué par leurs parents les rapproche en fait du modèle familial de leurs grands-parents. Cette volonté de perpétuer une tradition lignagère portée par des valeurs morales traduit un projet social et politique axé sur des idéaux de convivialité et de solidarité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.193

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropologicaSame topicReligion, Society, and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207