MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205915684 · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2007.12.025

European Consensus Conference on Diagnosis and Treatment of Germ Cell Cancer: A Report of the Second Meeting of the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group (EGCCCG): Part II

2008· article· en· W4205915684 on OpenAlexaff
S. Krege, Rainer Souchon, Peter Albers, Walter Albrecht, Ferrán Algaba, Michael Bamberg, I. Bodrogi, Carsten Bokemeyer, Eva Cavallin‐Ståhl, Johannes Claßen, C. Clemm, Gabriella Cohn‐Cedermark, Stéphane Culine, Gedske Daugaard, P.H.M. de Mulder, Maria De Santis, Maike de Wit, Ronald de Wit, Hans Günter Derigs, Klaus‐Peter Dieckmann, Annette Dieing, Jean‐Pierre Droz, Martin Fenner, Karim Fizazi, Aude Fléchon, Sophie D. Fosså, Xavier García del Muro, Thomas Gauler, Lajos Géczi, A. Gerl, J. R. Germa-Lluch, Silke Gillessen, Jörg T. Hartmann, Michael Hartmann, Axel Heidenreich, Wolfgang Hoeltl, A. Horwich, Robert Huddart, Michael Jewett, Johnathan Joffe, William G. Jones, L Kisbenedek, Olbjørn Klepp, Sabine Kliesch, Kai Uwe Koehrmann, Christian Kollmannsberger, Markus Kuczyk, Pilar Laguna, Ó. Leiva Galvis, V. Loy, Malcolm D. Mason, Graham M. Mead, R.P. Mueller, Craig R. Nichols, Nicola Nicolai, R.T.D. Oliver, D Ondruš, Gosse O.N. Oosterhof, Luis Paz‐Ares, Giorgio Pizzocaro, Jörg Pont, Tobias Pottek, Tom Powles, Oliver Rick, Giovanni Rosti, Roberto Salvioni, Jutta Scheiderbauer, Hans-Ulrich Schmelz, Heinz Schmidberger, Hans‐Joachim Schmoll, Mark Schrader, Felix Sedlmayer, Niels E. Skakkebæk, Aslam Sohaib, Sergei Tjulandin, Padraig Warde, S. Weinknecht, L. Weißbach, Christian Wittekind, Eva Winter, Lori Wood, Hans von der Maase

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Urology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTesticular diseases and treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineConsensus conferenceFamily medicineTesticular cancerRadiation therapyStage (stratigraphy)CancerClinical trialDiseaseGynecologyGeneral surgeryPathologySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.061
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.043
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0610.043
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.006
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0100.005
Research integrity0.0170.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations252
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueEuropean UrologySame topicTesticular diseases and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207