MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205934472 · doi:10.29277/cardio.36.3.3

Impacto de las políticas de salud en la incidencia de infarto de miocardio durante la pandemia por COVID-19 en Uruguay

2021· article· es· W4205934472 on OpenAlexaff
Víctor Dayan, Abayubá Perna, Enrique Soto, Dayan De Marzo, Dres Dayan, Álvaro Niggemeyer, Alejandro Cuesta, Natalia Piñeiro, Graciela Fernández, Rosana Gambogi

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Uruguaya de Cardiología · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Lifestyle Studies
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)MedicinePolitical scienceHumanitiesVirologyArtOutbreakInfectious disease (medical specialty)Disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introducción: las medidas sanitarias de emergencia impuestas para contener el SARS-CoV-2 pueden tener efectos colaterales en la atención de enfermedades cardiovasculares.Los datos mundiales de los países sobre la incidencia de infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST (IAMCEST) durante la pandemia son fundamentales para la política sanitaria futura.Objetivos: nuestro objetivo fue determinar si las medidas sanitarias de emergencia impuestas en Uruguay tuvieron un impacto directo en la calidad de la atención en la reperfusión del IAMCEST.Métodos: realizamos un estudio retrospectivo poblacional de todo el país para determinar la incidencia de reperfusión de IAMCEST (fibrinolíticos e intervención coronaria percutánea, FBL e ICP respectivamente) durante el período sanitario de emergencia.La tasa de incidencia de la reperfusión, el tiempo hasta la reperfusión y la mortalidad asociada se recopilaron de la base de datos del Fondo Nacional de Recursos (organización gubernamental única a cargo de la financiación de la reperfusión del IAMCEST en Uruguay).Estos mismos datos se recuperaron para 2019, 2018 y 2017.Resultados: se trataron durante el periodo de estudio del 2020 (136 pacientes) en comparación con 2019 (180 pacientes), 2018 (182 pacientes) y 2017 (174 pacientes).Se realizó FBL como tratamiento único en 5,1%, 7,2%, 7,7% y 12,1%, respectivamente.La razón de tasa de incidencia de IAMCEST durante el período estudiado en 2020 fue de 0,7 (IC95%: 0,59-0,91).La mediana del tiempo hasta la reperfusión fue similar en comparación con 2019, 2018 y 2017 (p = 0,4).No hubieron diferencias en la mortalidad a 15 dias entre los años evaluados.Conclusión: las medidas sanitarias de emergencia se asociaron con una disminución en la incidencia de reperfusión de IAMCEST, sin afectar el tiempo de reperfusión ni la mortalidad. Palabras clave:covid-19 iamcest epidemiología Impact of public health policies on the incidence of acute myocardial reperfusion during the initial stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in Uruguay Summary Introduction: the emergency health measures imposed to contain SARS-CoV-2 can have collateral effects in the care of cardiovascular diseases.Global country data on the incidence of ST acute myocardial infarction during the pandemic are critical for future health policy.Objectives: our objective was to determine if the emergency health measures imposed in Uruguay had a direct impact on the quality of ST elevation acute myocardial infarction care.Methods: we carried out a population-based retrospective study of the entire country to determine the incidence of Revista Uruguaya de Cardiología Volumen 36 | nº 3 | Noviembre 2021 Políticas de salud en la reperfusión de IAM durante la pandemia por COVID-19 Víctor Dayan, Abayubá Perna, Enrique Soto y colaboradores reperfusion of ST elevation acute myocardial infarction (fibrinolytic and percutaneous) during the emergency health period.The incidence rate of reperfusion, time to reperfusion, and associated mortality were collected from the Fondo Nacional de Recursos (the only government organization in charge of the reperfusion of ST elevation myocardial infarction in Uruguay).These same data were recovered for 2019, 2018 and 2017.Results: fewer patients were treated in 2020 (136 patients) compared to 2019 (180 patients), 2018 (182 patients), and 2017 (174 patients).Fibrinolytics was performed as the only treatment in 5.1%, 7.2%, 7.7% and 12.1% respectively.The proportion in incidence rate of ST elevation myocardial infarction during the study period in 2020 was lower (0.74, 95% CI: 0.59-0.91).The median time to reperfusion was similar compared to 2019, 2018, and 2017 (p = 0.4).Mortality at 15 days was similar in 2017 (8%), 2018 (6%), 2019 (11%) and 2020 (8%).Conclusion: emergency health measures were associated with a decrease in the incidence of reperfusion of ST elevation myocardial infarction without affecting the time to reperfusion and mortality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.171
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.402 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Uruguaya de CardiologíaSame topicHealth and Lifestyle StudiesFrench-language works237,207