MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205956924 · doi:10.23952/jnva.5.2021.3.02

Free boundary and retirement benefits pricing in a jump-diffusion model

2021· article· en· W4205956924 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Baojun Bian, Chaoyang Hao, Hong‐Kun Xu, Quan Yuan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nonlinear and Variational Analysis · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
Topicdemographic modeling and climate adaptation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsJump diffusionJumpDiffusionBoundary (topology)EconomicsEconometricsBusinessMathematicsMathematical analysisPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this paper is to give, by PDE argument, a pricing analysis for the defined benefits retirement pension plan that allows early retirement. The paid benefits on retirement depend on the time and the salary at that time which is assumed to follow a jump-diffusion process. Existence, uniqueness and regularity of the solution to an integro-differential parabolic variational inequality which models the retirement benefits pricing are proved. We also discuss the corresponding free boundary problem and deduce properties of the free boundary which corresponds to the optimal strategy to retirement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.186
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nonlinear and Variational AnalysisSame topicdemographic modeling and climate adaptationFrench-language works237,207