The Behavioural and Topological Effects of Measurement Noise on Evolutionary Neurocontrollers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The disparity in performance between simulated and real systems is a major problem in robotics and other fields. Simulating measurement noise is one method of reducing these performance differences. Here, we examine the effect of measurement noise on the behaviour and topology of evolved neuromodulated neurocontrollers applied to control evader agents in a pursuit-evasion game. Measurement noise in the form of a zero-mean, normally distributed random signal is applied to the evader’s radar range and angle signals. The results indicate that increasing the levels of measurement noise increases the number of generations required to evolve fit agents. Noise at the neurocontroller outputs is of lesser amplitude than that at the inputs, suggesting a low-pass filtering operation. When levels of measurement noise different to those with which they were evolved were applied to the neurocontrollers, greater amplitude in the measurement noise signal increased the average length of time required to capture the evader. When the level of measurement noise was changed during evolution, after a few generations of further evolution, the neurocontrollers were able to adapt to both increases and decreases in the amount of noise. The evolutionary neurocontrollers are robust to high levels of measurement noise and can adapt to large changes in noise amplitude. This suggests that the neurocontrollers will be robust when used in the field on real robots, and that they may be a good solution to bridging the gap between simulation and reality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".