MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205968278 · doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-000-3

Xenopus Protocols

2006· book· en· W4205968278 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods in molecular biology · 2006
Typebook
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCore Research for Evolutional Science and TechnologyU.S. National Library of MedicineNational Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Cancer InstituteCollege of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of AberdeenRIKENMedical Research CouncilBiosignal Research Center, Kobe UniversityBaylor UniversityUniversity of California, San FranciscoVan Andel Research InstituteIstituto Pasteur-Fondazione Cenci BolognettiUniversity of California, San DiegoUniversity of OttawaJoint Genome InstituteDirectorate for Biological SciencesNational Institutes of HealthUniversity of WaterlooInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversity of OxfordUniversity of AberdeenMedical Center, University of RochesterUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioUniversity of California, IrvineNovartis Institutes for BioMedical ResearchUniversität BaselUniversity of TokyoJohns Hopkins UniversityUniversity of RochesterBaylor College of MedicineJapan Science and Technology AgencyU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsXenopusComputer scienceBiologyComputational biologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.284
Threshold uncertainty score0.952

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2840.220

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueMethods in molecular biologySame topicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsFrench-language works237,207