MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205971129 · doi:10.1109/smc52423.2021.9658987

Hybrid Neuro-Fractal Analysis of ECG Signal to Predict Ischemia

2021· article· en· W4205971129 on OpenAlexaff
Hedieh Montazeri, Shermineh Ghasemi, Alireza Sadeghian

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFractalArtificial neural networkComputer scienceFeedforward neural networkPattern recognition (psychology)Logistic regressionMultivariate statisticsArtificial intelligenceSIGNAL (programming language)Fractal analysisLinear regressionStatisticsMachine learningMathematicsFractal dimension

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we proposed a new hybrid model to predict the number of ischemia occurrences in heart patients based on their ECG records using fractal analysis, statistical analysis, and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). Fractal analysis is employed to determine the long-term correlations on ECG signal. The statistical analysis methods like binary logistic regression and multivariate linear regression are applied to investigate the correlation of parameters to increase model’s accuracy. Finally, selected features are fed into the feedforward neural networks to predict the number of ischemia occurrences. One of the advantages of this work compared to similar existing works is its capability to extract useful parameters from fractal analysis of the signals and the clinical characteristics to make a prediction. Our results compare well with those of the earlier works and the augmentation of the above-mentioned approaches proves the prediction accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.852
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2021 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)Same topicComplex Systems and Time Series AnalysisFrench-language works237,207