Application of Machine Learning in Auditing Teaching: A Case Study of Predicting the Audit Report Type of China ST Listed Companies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>Artificial intelligence is an important emerging technology in the accounting industry. Fear and hype associated with artificial intelligence and its impact on accounting and auditing jobs have pervaded the professional fields of accounting and auditing. It is important to develop AI competency in accountants and auditors. This paper presents a teaching case for a professor or lecturer to use for teaching machine learning to accounting students. The case is based on openly available data from the China Stock Market & Accounting Research database and aims to teach students how to predict the future audit report type of a China ST listed company. Through case teaching, students can learn skills related to computer-assisted auditing tools and machine learning (such as ACL) develop the confidence to apply artificial intelligence in their education and future work.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it