Bibliographic record
Abstract
As a work of the central Middle Ages, the oldest (A-)version of Annates Cambriae is particularly unusual in still displaying multiple paschal reflexes. It also contains paschal statements which seem irrelevant in the time and place of its origin, tenth-century Mynyw. It displays an authorial concern with development towards paschal virtue in Britain and the adoption of decennovenal paschal cycles among the Welsh, in replacement of the pre-existing eighty-four-year cycles. On the other hand, several dislocations in the Harleian manuscript appear to indicate the underlying use of an eighty-four-year cycle. The annals concerning paschal matters and the Harleian manuscript together appear to indicate the existence of a mid-ninth century source, possibly from Gwynedd, for the chronicle which was compiled in Mynyw in the third quarter of the tenth century. The A-text of Annates Cambriae, then, was not extracted from the margins of a paschal cycle but carries in it the vestiges of the Insular Easter-controversy of the sixth, seventh, and eighth centuries, as they were recorded and reflected in its ninth-century Venedotian source.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".