MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206008291 · doi:10.1111/resp.14197

Pulmonary functional <scp>MRI</scp>: Detecting the <scp>structure–function</scp> pathologies that drive asthma symptoms and <scp>quality of life</scp>

2022· review· en· W4206008291 on OpenAlexafffund
H.K. Kooner, Marrissa J. McIntosh, Vedanth Desaigoudar, Jonathan H. Rayment, Rachel L. Eddy, Bastiaan Driehuys, Grace Párraga

Bibliographic record

VenueRespirology · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaWestern University
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteCystic Fibrosis CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMichael Smith Health Research BCCystic Fibrosis Foundation
KeywordsMedicineAsthmaFunction (biology)Pulmonary function testingImmunologyCell biologyInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Pulmonary functional MRI (PfMRI) using inhaled hyperpolarized, radiation‐free gases (such as 3 He and 129 Xe) provides a way to directly visualize inhaled gas distribution and ventilation defects (or ventilation heterogeneity) in real time with high spatial (~mm 3 ) resolution. Both gases enable quantitative measurement of terminal airway morphology, while 129 Xe uniquely enables imaging the transfer of inhaled gas across the alveolar–capillary tissue barrier to the red blood cells. In patients with asthma, PfMRI abnormalities have been shown to reflect airway smooth muscle dysfunction, airway inflammation and remodelling, luminal occlusions and airway pruning. The method is rapid (8–15 s), cost‐effective (~$300/scan) and very well tolerated in patients, even in those who are very young or very ill, because unlike computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography and single‐photon emission CT, there is no ionizing radiation and the examination takes only a few seconds. However, PfMRI is not without limitations, which include the requirement of complex image analysis, specialized equipment and additional training and quality control. We provide an overview of the three main applications of hyperpolarized noble gas MRI in asthma research including: (1) inhaled gas distribution or ventilation imaging, (2) alveolar microstructure and finally (3) gas transfer into the alveolar–capillary tissue space and from the tissue barrier into red blood cells in the pulmonary microvasculature. We highlight the evidence that supports a deeper understanding of the mechanisms of asthma worsening over time and the pathologies responsible for symptoms and disease control. We conclude with a summary of approaches that have the potential for integration into clinical workflows and that may be used to guide personalized treatment planning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRespirologySame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207