Integrated UAV Trajectory Control and Resource Allocation for UAV-Based Wireless Networks With Co-Channel Interference Management
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, we study the trajectory control, subchannel assignment, and user association design for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)-based wireless networks. We propose a method to optimize the max-min average rate subject to data demand constraints of ground users (GUs) where spectrum reuse and co-channel interference management are considered. The mathematical model is a mixed-integer nonlinear optimization problem which we solve by using the alternating optimization approach where we iteratively optimize the user association, subchannel assignment, and UAV trajectory control until convergence. For the subchannel assignment subproblem, we propose an iterative subchannel assignment (ISA) algorithm to obtain an efficient solution. Moreover, the successive convex approximation (SCA) is used to convexify and solve the nonconvex UAV trajectory control subproblem. Via extensive numerical studies, we illustrate the effectiveness of our proposed design considering different UAV flight periods and number of subchannels and GUs as compared with a simple heuristic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it