Efficient and Explainable Deep Neural Networks for Airway Symptom Detection in Support of Wearable Health Technology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mobile health wearables are often embedded with small processors for signal acquisition and analysis. These embedded wearable systems are, however, limited with low available memory and computational power. Advances in machine learning, especially deep neural networks (DNNs), have been adopted for efficient and intelligent applications to overcome constrained computational environments. In this study, evolutionary optimized DNNs were analyzed to classify three common airway-related symptoms, namely coughs, throat clears and dry swallows. As opposed to typical microphone-acoustic signals, mechanoacoustic data signals, which did not contain identifiable speech information for better privacy protection, were acquired from laboratory-generated and publicly available datasets. The optimized DNNs had a low footprint of less than 150 kB and predicted airway symptoms of interests with 83.7% accuracy on unseen data. By performing explainable AI techniques, namely occlusion experiments and class activation maps, mel-frequency bands up to 8,000 Hz were found as the most important feature for the classification. We further found that DNN decisions were consistently relying on these specific features, fostering trust and transparency of proposed DNNs. Our proposed efficient and explainable DNN is expected to support edge computing on mechano-acoustic sensing wearables for remote, longterm monitoring of airway symptoms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".