MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206044874 · doi:10.1093/yiel/yvaa008

C. Non-Compliance Procedures

2019· article· en· W4206044874 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Simon Marsden

Bibliographic record

VenueYearbook of International Environmental Law · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicRegulation and Compliance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConventionProtocol (science)Montreal ProtocolEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental protectionPolitical scienceLawOzone layerOzoneMedicineGeographyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This year’s annual report focuses on the procedure established under the 1979 UN Commission for Europe (UNECE) Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP Convention). While the convention did not provide procedures, an Implementation Committee (IC) was initially established in 1994 by the 1994 Sulphur Protocol II; this was based on the IC of the Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer and subsequently became the procedure for all of the protocols of this convention. These also include the Protocol on Heavy Metals, the Protocol on Persistent Organic Pollutants (Protocol on POPs), and the Protocol to Abate Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground-level Ozone (Gothenburg Protocol). In 1997, an IC was comprehensively set up by the Convention Executive Body (EB) to review compliance by parties with their obligations under the protocols to the LRTAP Convention. Its work focused on three main areas: considering cases of possible non-compliance by an individual...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.654
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYearbook of International Environmental LawSame topicRegulation and Compliance StudiesFrench-language works237,207