Bibliographic record
Abstract
This year’s annual report focuses on the procedure established under the 1979 UN Commission for Europe (UNECE) Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP Convention). While the convention did not provide procedures, an Implementation Committee (IC) was initially established in 1994 by the 1994 Sulphur Protocol II; this was based on the IC of the Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer and subsequently became the procedure for all of the protocols of this convention. These also include the Protocol on Heavy Metals, the Protocol on Persistent Organic Pollutants (Protocol on POPs), and the Protocol to Abate Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground-level Ozone (Gothenburg Protocol). In 1997, an IC was comprehensively set up by the Convention Executive Body (EB) to review compliance by parties with their obligations under the protocols to the LRTAP Convention. Its work focused on three main areas: considering cases of possible non-compliance by an individual...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.091 | 0.164 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.054 | 0.029 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".